C2 overview


Moving from the protective environment of an elementary grades classroom—where in most cases, students spend the day with the same teacher and the same group of students—to the middle grades—where students may need to rotate between three or more teachers and interact with a larger group of students—can be challenging and intimidating for students. This transition often results in a reduction of the number of friendships in students’ lives,1 which can be an additional adjustment. Research indicates that when students transition to the middle grades, there is an increase in incidents requiring school discipline (e.g., in-school suspension) for disturbance to the class learning environment or unwillingness to follow rules.2 There is also evidence of a predictive association between the number of disruptive behavior incidents during elementary and middle grades years and school failure in high school, even when socioeconomic status and intellectual differences are taken into consideration.3 Middle grades students need common academic behavior and academic expectations, rewards, and consequences. Think of a middle grades student’s experience throughout the day. If it is vastly different from classroom to classroom, he or she will not internalize strong behavioral and academic norms.

This chapter identifies ways schools can support middle grades students through these challenges. First, we describe what research has shown to be effective school wide strategies for reducing the risk of students’ dropping out or disengaging from school. Second, we show how to develop and maintain a school climate and culture that emphasizes high academic achievement and student success supported by every member of the school faculty, and we emphasize effective strategies for forming a school-family-community partnership. Third, we describe specific school wide strategies for behavior support through the use of clear and common expectations. We also present targeted activities to motivate students and improve attendance, as well as academic and social behavior. Finally, we outline the expectations for effective extended learning opportunities that enable students to continue to learn in a way that is integrated with their regular school day and are also geared towards meeting students’ needs.

The following content dimensions are included in this chapter on student supports that enhance learning:
Dropout Prevention
School Climate, Culture, and Partnerships
Student Behavior Supports and Motivation
Extended Learning Time

C3 overview


The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB) increased awareness of educational accountability and the need for greater focus on educational outcomes. Education stakeholders—from school boards to parents, teachers, superintendents, and even state legislators—are now using data as an important lever in education reform. This is a necessary condition for implementing performance management as a framework for improving school and student performance. For the purposes of this discussion, the term performance management has been borrowed from the field of business to describe an approach to building the capacity of educators at all levels to use data to prioritize activities that advance core goals, measure progress toward meeting these goals, and make informed decisions about the best ways to improve student achievement. Looking systemically at how all the components of the education system work together to support student learning is the primary goal of this new management approach.

While much of the strategic planning for performance management happens at the district level, implementation happens at each school site in a school district. School principals are on the front line, carrying out new programs, interventions, and curriculum and instruction. As managers of teacher and student performance, principals need information about how every part of the school is operating. Education indicators provide leaders with new understanding of capacity and productivity to meet students’ educational needs and can inform teachers and other educators of progress on improvements to the education system. Annual trends and outcomes, as well as day-to-day information on attendance, course performance, behavior, etc., are needed to monitor and fine-tune system performance. A primary goal of performance management is to aid schools and staff as they shift from an attitude of compliance to a new commitment to continuous improvement.

What follows are five practical and evidence-based principles that can be used to develop and implement effective performance management strategies in the middle grades, along with a description of the rationale behind each principle, and a few specific practices and examples that schools can follow to ensure success. These principles provide direction on using data to improve instruction and learning, monitoring progress toward goals, and evaluating the effectiveness of decisions.

Writing Instructional Practices


Writing is an integral tool that supports and connects learning in all content areas in the middle grades. Students must master writing processes, knowledge, and skills. Students “learn to write” and “write to learn.”

VIDEO GOES HERE!

Overview of Writing Principles and Practices

Principle 1: Establish consistent schoolwide practices for using writing as a tool to support student learning in all content areas.

  • Practice 1: Ask students to analyze, interpret, or personalize in writing information that has been read or presented.
  • Practice 2: Ask students to provide written summaries of material read or presented in class.
  • Practice 3: Ask students to take written notes about material read or presented in class.
  • Practice 4: Ask students to answer questions in writing about material read or presented in class.

Principle 2: Explicitly and systematically teach students the processes, knowledge, and skills of e active writing.

  • Practice 1: Analyze and emulate model text to discover the characteristics of good writing and the features of speci c types of text.
  • Practice 2: Model and teach strategies for planning, drafting, revising, editing, and publishing written work.
  • Practice 3: Teach students how to construct complex sentences. Practice 4: Re ne students’ spelling, grammar, and usage skills.

Principle 3: Establish word processing as the common medium for student writing.

  • Practice 1: Make enough word processors available in the school so that all students can use them to complete writing assignments.
  • Practice 2: Teach keyboarding skills and how to use word processing programs and software.

Principle 4: Assess and monitor student writing to improve instruction and identify students who require more intensive writing instruction.

  • Practice 1: Monitor students’ progress as writers.
  • Practice 2: Provide students with feedback about their writing.
  • Practice 3: Teach students how to give one another feedback about their writing.
  • Practice 4: Teach students how to assess the quality of their own writing.

Principle 5: Provide extra assistance and instruction to students who experience difficulty learning to write.

  • Practice 1: Provide students with intensive and extra instruction to acquire the strategies, knowledge, and writing skills that still need to be mastered.
  • Practice 2: Teach students how to use word processing programs and software that provide assistance for targeted writing strategies and skills.
  • Practice 3: Provide to students experiencing di culties intensive and extra instruction in using writing as a tool to support content learning.

Principle 6: Discontinue using practices that are NOT associated with improved outcomes for students.

  • Practice 1: Take stock of all of the instructional practices and models currently implemented and determine whether they are necessary and associated with improved outcomes for students.

Principle 7: Improve teacher capacity to teach writing and use it as a tool for learning.

  • Practice 1: Provide ongoing in-service professional development to all teachers to increase their capacity to teach writing.
  • Practice 2: Have teachers create learning groups to share their best writing practices and work together to discover new ones.

More Writing Resources

Research-Based Math Instructional Strategies


Mathematics includes a set of knowledge and skills used to access science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) applications and careers as well as a tool for improving reasoning and analytic thinking. Effective math instructional strategies include using manipulatives to introduce mathematics concepts and applying systematic strategies for solving word problems.

Overview of Math Principles and Practices

Principle 1: Establish schoolwide practices for enhancing mathematics understanding within relevant content area instruction.

  • Practice 1: Encourage students to apply their understanding of mathematics concepts and procedures to draw conclusions and propose solutions about history, science, social studies, economics, and other content areas.
  • Practice 2: Ask students to analyze events and phenomena from a quantitative perspective and use their analyses to develop arguments and provide just cations.

Principle 2: Use a universal screener to identify students at risk for mathematics difficulties and to determine interventions to provide these at-risk students. Monitor the development of mathematics knowledge and skills of identified students.

  • Practice 1: Identify a system for screening and progress monitoring that prioritizes content and skills necessary for subsequent mathematics development.
  • Practice 2: Select a cut score for screening that balances the need to help the most at-risk students with the resources available.

Principle 3: Help students recognize number systems and expand their understanding beyond whole numbers to integers and rational numbers. Use number lines as a central representational tool in teaching this and other rational number concepts.

  • Practice 1: Use measurement activities and number lines to help students understand that fractions and decimals are numbers and share number properties.
  • Practice 2: Provide opportunities for students to locate and compare fractions and decimals on number lines.
  • Practice 3: Use number lines to improve students’ understanding of fraction equivalence, fraction density (the concept that there are an in nite number of fractions between any two fractions), and negative fractions.
  • Practice 4: Explain that fractions can be represented as common fractions, decimals, and percentages, and develop students’ ability to translate among these forms.

Principle 4: Develop students’ conceptual understanding of mathematics and provide ample opportunities to improve procedural fluency.

  • Practice 1: Use area models, number lines, and other visual representations to improve students’ understanding of formal computational procedures.
  • Practice 2: Use meaningful fact practice activities for students lacking a strong foundation in math facts.
  • Practice 3: Address common misconceptions regarding computational procedures. Practice 4: Present real-world contexts with plausible numbers for problems.

Principle 5: Provide explicit and systematic instruction during instruction and intervention.

  • Practice 1: Include explicit teacher or peer modeling and demonstrate key concepts and skills.
  • Practice 2: Include worked examples of key concepts and skills.
  • Practice 3: Gradually transition from teacher-modeled problem solving to student- directed problem solving.
  • Practice 4: Include opportunities for students to talk aloud about the skills, knowledge, or problem-solving procedures they are learning.
  • Practice 5: Provide immediate and corrective feedback with opportunities for students to correct errors.
  • Practice 6: Include sufficient, distributed, and cumulative practice and review.

Principle 6: Instruction should include strategies for solving word and algebra problems that are based on common underlying structures.

  • Practice 1: Include systematic instruction on the structural connections between known, familiar, and novel word problems.
  • Practice 2: Teach common problem types and their structures, as well as how to categorize and select appropriate solution methods for each problem type.

Principle 7: For students who struggle in mathematics, instruction and intervention materials should include opportunities to work with representations of mathematical ideas. Teachers should be proficient in the use of these representations.

  • Practice 1: Employ visual representations to model mathematical concepts.
  • Practice 2: Explicitly link a visual representation or model with the abstract mathematical symbol or concept.
  • Practice 3: Use consistent language across similar representations.

Principle 8: Establish a schoolwide plan to identify and improve teachers’ mathematical and pedagogical content knowledge.

  • Practice 1: Assess teachers’ needs in relation to mathematics content knowledge and mathematics pedagogical content knowledge across content areas.
  • Practice 2: Select and implement high-quality professional development that acknowledges different teachers’ needs.
  • Practice 3: Improve teachers’ knowledge and understanding of making practice decisions based on research evidence and student data.

Principle 9: Discontinue using practices that are NOT associated with improved outcomes for students and teachers.

  • Practice 1: Examine the evidentiary bases of practices currently used in teaching mathematics and identify and eliminate practices that are contra- indicated by existing evidence.
  • Practice 2: Monitor student learning formally and informally and use trend data to determine whether and how to adjust current practices.

More Math Resources

Research Base for Writing Strategies and SRSD

Baker, S. K., Chard, D. J., Ketterlin-Geller, L. R., Apichatabutra, C., & Doabler, C. (2009). Teaching writing to at-risk students: The quality of evidence for Self-Regulated Strategy Development. Exceptional Children, 75, 303–318. doi:10.1177/001440290907500303

De La Paz, S. (2005). Effects of historical reasoning instruction and writing strategy mastery in culturally and academically diverse middle school classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 139–156. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.97.2.139

De La Paz, S., & Graham, S. (1997). Effects of dictation and advanced planning instruction on the composing of students with writing and learning problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 203–222.

De La Paz, S., & Graham, S. (2002). Explicitly teaching strategies, skills, and knowledge: Writing instruction in middle school classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 203–222. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.94.4.687

Garcia-Sanchez, J., & Fidalgo-Redondo, R. (2006). Effects of two types of self-regulatory instruction programs on students with learning disabilities in writing products, processes, and self-efficacy. Learning Disability Quarterly, 29, 181–211.

Gillespie, A., & Graham, S. (2014). A meta-analysis of writing interventions for students with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 80, 454–473. doi:0.1177/0014402914527238

Graham, S., MacArthur, C. A., & Fitzgerald, J. (Eds.). (2013). Best practices in writing instruction (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007a). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 445–476. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.445

Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007b). Writing next: Effective strategies to improve writing of adolescents in middle and high schools. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellence in Education. Retrieved from http://carnegie.org/fileadmin/Media/Publications/PDF/writingnext.pdf

Mason, L. H., Kubina, R. M., Kostewicz, D. E., Cramer, A. M., & Datchuk, S. (2013). Improving quick writing performance of middle-school struggling learners. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38, 236–246. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2013.04.002

Torrance, M., Fidalgo, R., & Garcia, J. (2007). The teachability and effectiveness of cognitive self-regulation in sixth-grade writers. Learning and Instruction, 17, 265–285. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.02.003

Troia, G. (2014). Evidence-based practices for writing instruction (IC-5). Gainesville, FL: University of Florida, Collaboration for Effective Educator Development, Accountability, and Reform Center. Retrieved from http://ceedar.education.ufl.edu/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/IC-5_FINAL_08-31-14.pdf

Wong, B. Y., Hoskyn, M., Jai, D., Ellis, P., & Watson, K. (2008). The comparative efficacy of two approaches to teaching sixth graders opinion essay writing. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33, 757–784. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2007.12.004